🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – not just the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in the city, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

It was necessary because they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were large groups of votes added after that and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible where election day went kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner gained half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump previously backed Zohran this year. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over half. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Including Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That really was unexpected. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe occurred significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened prior to the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there existed some opposition. But no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

There are neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that every city in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – since they’re young, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities we face.